Post by John Davison, Research Director (retired), INRA Versailles, France.
In 2011, the European Court of Justice (ECJ) made a judgement regarding the case Bablok and Others v. Freistaat Bayern(1). Honey produced on Bablok’s farm was supposedly found to contain pollen from genetically modified MON810 maize(2, 3). It should be noted that no accredited scientific evidence regarding quantification of MON810 pollen in Bablok’s honey was ever published.
Based upon these ‘facts’, and with reference to Regulation (EC) No 1830/2003, the ECJ concluded Bablok’s honey contained ingredients produced from GMOs within the meaning of the regulation. The situation was further complicated by the fact that MON810 maize was authorized for cultivation and consumption but, at that time, MON810 pollen was not authorized as food (this has now been rectified). The threshold for unauthorized GM-pollen is 0%.
The ECJ decision was taken without…
View original post 809 more words